Silicon Valley Bank’s failure has prompted investors to call for government bailouts

Employees stand outside the shuttered Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) headquarters on March 10, 2023 in Santa Clara, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Big names in Silicon Valley and the financial industry are publicly calling on the federal government to pressure another bank to take over the assets and liabilities of Silicon Valley Bank after the financial institution failed on Friday.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will cover up to $250,000 per depositors and may start paying those depositors as early as Monday.

But the vast majority of SVB’s customers were companies that had more than what was in the bank. In December, more than 95% of the bank’s deposits were uninsured, according to regulatory filings. Many of these depositors are startups, and many are worried they won’t be able to pay salaries this month, which could in turn trigger a broad wave of failures and layoffs in the tech industry.

Investors are concerned that these failures could reduce confidence in the banking sector, particularly mid-sized banks with less than $250 billion in deposits. These banks are not considered “too big to fail” and do not have to undergo regular stress tests or other safety valve measures adopted in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

Venture capitalist and former tech CEO David Sacks urged the federal government to pressure another bank to buy SVB’s assets, writes on Twitter“Where is Powell? Where is Yellen? Stop this crisis NOW. Announce that all depositors will be safe. Place SVB with a Top 4 bank. Do this before Monday’s open or there will be contagion and the crisis will spread.”

VC Mark Suster agreed, tweeting: “I suspect that’s what they’re working on. I expect statements by Sunday. We’ll see. I sure hope so or Monday will be brutal.”

Investor Bill Ackman made a similar argument in a long tweetwrites: “The government has about 48 hours to fix a soon-to-be-irreparable mistake. By allowing @SVB_Financial to fail without protecting all depositors, the world has woken up to what an uninsured deposit is – an unsecured illiquid claim on a failed bank. Absent @jpmorgan @citi or @Bank of america takeover of SVB before the opening on Monday, a prospect which I think is unlikely, or the government guarantees all of SVB’s deposits, the giant sucking sound you will hear will be the withdrawal of virtually all uninsured deposits from all but the ‘systemically of important banks (SIBs).”

Benchmark Partner Eric Vishria wrote“If SVB depositors are not made whole, then corporate boards will have to insist that their businesses use two or more of the four BIG banks exclusively. Which will crush smaller banks. AND make the problem too big to go down much worse.”

Since its founding nearly 40 years ago, SVB had become a focal point for finance in the tech industry, especially for startups and the VCs that invest in them. The firm was known for extending banking services to early-stage startups that would have struggled to get banking services elsewhere before generating steady cash flow. But the firm itself faced cash flow problems this year as startup funding dried up and its own assets locked up in long-term bonds.

The company surprised investors on Wednesday with news that it needed to raise $2.25 billion to shore up its balance sheet and that it had sold all of its available-for-sale bonds at a loss of $1.8 billion. Assurances by the bank’s executives were not enough to stop a run, and depositors withdrew more than $42 billion by the end of Thursday, creating the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history.

Many in the tech community blamed VCs for fueling the run, as many told their portfolio companies to put their money in safer places after SVB’s Wednesday announcement.

“This was a hysteria-induced bank run caused by VCs,” Ryan Falvey, a fintech investor at Restive Ventures, told CNBC on Friday. “This will go down as one of the ultimate cases of an industry cutting off its nose in spite of its face.”

Observers highlight the irony that some VCs with notoriously libertarian free-market stances are now calling for a bailout. For example, reactions to Sacks’ tweet included statements like “Excuse me Mr. Suddenly the government is the answer?!?“and”We capitalists want socialism!

Some politicians opposed any bailout, with Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., tweeting“If there is an effort to use taxpayer money to save Silicon Valley Bank, the American people can count on me to be there and lead the fight against it.”

But financier and former Trump communications director Anthony Scaramucci argued“It’s not a political decision to save SVB. Don’t make the Lehman mistake. It’s not about rich or poor who benefits, it’s about stopping contagion and protecting the system. Make depositors whole or expect a lot of tragic accidental consequences.”

Hugh Son and Ari Levy contributed to this story.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
%d bloggers like this: